Q This assignment was locked Jun 28, 2021 at 11:59pm. Each student in the class will pick an original topic on ethics in IT and write a paper, create a mind map that will be used to present your topic. Some possible topics include cyber bullying, censorship, Two Factor Authentication, passwords, licensing, surveillance, mobile payments, Google, geotagging, workplace monitoring, spam, recognition software, identity theft, phishing, spyware, swiping, Big Data, consumer profiling, global positioning (GPS), NSA, Snowden, RFIDs, cookies, whistle blowers, computer malware - viruses, worms, Trojan horses, Hackers/ Crackers, encryption, E-waste or a topic of your choice. This assignment is worth 100 pts. Requirements - paper and mind map The Paper: • In a 3-4 page APA formatted paper explain o what your ethics topic is about o give 3 current examples involving your ethics topics. o Why is your ethics topic important to individuals, IT professionals, business and government?W • Your paper should be three to four pages of body (no more, no less), a cover page and a reference page • Include at least 5 references (other than your text book) in APA format. At least three sources should be from a library resource subscription service from computer professional organizations (ex ACM, IEEE). You want articles that are peer reviewed. (Links to an external site.) When using the Wilmington University library databases be sure to look at Discovery How to guide (Links to an external site.) for help searching for peer reviewed articles. • Evaluate, research, and cite specific examples from valid resources. • Do not use blogs and advertisements.. The Mind Map: • What is Mind Mapping? (Links to an external site.) • The easiest way to make a mind map is to create it using one PowerPoint slide adding photos and graphics to make it very visual • The mind map will describe your ethics topic and will be the only visual aid that you will use to present your ethics topic. • Your mind map should include graphics and photos with few words. The graphics and photos are to be used as prompts for your video presentation. Please attach an submit your paper and your mind map in this assignment link. Look at the rubric for specific requirements and pertinent grading information. Rubric COT PHI 314 Ethics Topic Rubric OA COT PHI 314 Ethics Topic Rubric OA Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoT PHI 314 Topic Coverage Topic coverage. Does paper and presentation define your topic and include topical information on your topic? Does the paper and presentation cover the importance of the topic to individuals, IT professionals, government and business? threshold: 20.0 pts 25 pts Excellent (Extremely thorough coverage of topic areas. In-depth analysis. Exceptional amount of data from cases, laws, class work presented. Exceptional critical thinking skills.) 21.75 pts Good (Thorough coverage of most aspects of the topic. Ample amount of data used in presentation of analysis. Gives examples from cases, laws, class work. Clear evidence of critical thinking provided) 19.5 pts Satisfactory (Covers most aspects of the topic. Moderate amount of data presented as a foundation for analysis. Adequate analysis.) 17.25 pts Emerging (Minimal coverage of topic with little analysis. Major aspects of topics were poorly addressed and used minimal data and examples.) 0 pts Unsatisfactory (Scant or incomplete coverage of topic with weak analysis. No use of data to support analysis.) 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoT PHI 314 Evaluate the Research Evaluated the research. Research from a library subscription service (preferably from subscription service from a computer professional organization)and other sources generally accepted as legitimate and valid threshold: 20.0 pts 25 pts Excellent (Highly effective evaluation of information and its sources. Fully considers the authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, context, and coverage of information and its sources. Uses multiple excellent sources from websites, technical sources and journals from computer professional organizations or library resource subscription services.) 21.75 pts Good (Effective evaluation of information and its sources. Considers the authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, context, and coverage of information and its sources. Uses some good resources from websites, technical sources and journals from computer professional organizations or library resource subscription services.) 19.5 pts Satisfactory (Basic evaluation of information and its sources. Some consideration for authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, context, and coverage of information and its sources. Minimal amount of research from websites, technical sources and journals from computer professional organizations or library resource subscription services.) 17.25 pts Emerging (Ineffective evaluation of information and its sources. Minimal and/or incorrect consideration for authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, context, and coverage of information and its sources. Wikis or Blogs were used. No journals from computer professional organizations or library resource subscription services.) 0 pts Unsatisfactory (No attempt is made to evaluate information and its sources. No sources listed or very poor research sources used. Journals not used.) 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoT PHI 314 Presentation Presentation. Is presentation well organized, logical, clear and connect with target audience? Does content flow and cover all requirements? Is the narration conversational, not read or memorized? Is the presentation length 6 to 8 minutes? threshold: 16.0 pts 20 pts Excellent (Extremely well organized and easy to read. Clear, logical and focused with no evidence of “padding”. Complete and thorough coverage of requirements. Narration is conversational. Relates and connects with target audience. Presentation is 6 to 8 minutes.) 17.4 pts Good (Well organized, clear and precise presentation of ideas. Presentation requirements covered. Does connect with target audience. Narration is conversational but with with a few pauses and vocal qualities that distract. Presentation is 6 to 8 minutes.) 15.6 pts Satisfactory (Somewhat well organized and focused. Some presentation requirements covered but not in-depth. Speaker has a number of pauses and distracting vocal qualities. Connects somewhat with target audience. Presentation is 5 minutes or over 8 minutes.) 13.8 pts Emerging (Minimal organization, lacks clarity and exhibits imprecise use of language. Missing major presentation requirements. Most of the narration is read or memorized. Narration makes comprehension of topic difficult to understand. Does not reach or connect with target audience.Presentation is 3-4 minutes or over 9 minutes.) 0 pts Unsatisfactory (Presentation lacks organization clarity and focus. Content does not flow and requirements not covered. The entire narration is read. Does not reach target audience. Presentation is either barely 2 minutes or over 10 minutes.) 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoT PHI 314 MindMap MindMap threshold: 4.0 pts 5 pts Excellent (Excellent mind map. Contains excellent graphics and text that relate to the article. Can clearly discern what topic and presentation is about) 4.35 pts Good (Visually appealing. Contains some good graphics and text that relate to the topic and presentation Can discern what topic is about) 3.9 pts Satisfactory (Good mind map. Contains graphics and text that make it somewhat difficult to discern what topic and current event is about) 3.45 pts Emerging (Contains limited graphics or no graphics or is cluttered with too many words or graphics. Difficult to discern what topic and presentation is about) 0 pts Unsatisfactory (no mind map) 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoT PHI 314 Writing clarity, purpose and conventions Writing clarity, purpose and conventions threshold: 16.0 pts 20 pts Excellent (Work exceeds expectations for this level of student.Relates and connects with target audience. No grammar errors found.) 17.4 pts Good (Work appropriate for this level of student. Does connect with target audience. 1 error -sentence structure -capitalization -grammar -presentation -general structure) 15.6 pts Satisfactory (Just meets expectations for work at this level. Connects somewhat with target audience. 2-3 errors -sentence structure -capitalization -grammar -presentation -general structure) 13.8 pts Emerging (Below expectations for work at this level. Poor writing makes it difficult to connect with target audience. 4-5 errors -sentence structure -capitalization -grammar -presentation -general structure) 0 pts Unsatisfactory (Far below expectations for work at this level. Writing is extremely unfocused. rambling, or contains major errors; lacks detail and relevant data and information; extremely disorganized.Writing does not connect to target audience. Multiple errors -sentence structure -capitalization -grammar -presentation -general structure) 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCoT PHI 314 APA Format APA Format threshold: 4.0 pts 5 pts Excellent (No APA errors) 4.35 pts Good (1 error -cover page -in text citations -reference page -general format) 3.9 pts Satisfactory (2-3 errors -cover page -in text citations -reference page -general format) 3.45 pts Emerging (4-5 errors -cover page -in text citations -reference page -general format) 0 pts Unsatisfactory (Several errors in: -cover page -in text citations -reference page -general format Does not use APA guidelines.) 5 pts Total Points: 100 PreviousNext